National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network Meeting Report: Managing Patients Exposed to Xylazine-Adulterated Opioids in Emergency, Hospital and Addiction Care Settings.

Used as a veterinary sedative and not approved for human use, xylazine has been increasingly linked with opioid overdose deaths in the United States. A growing number of people have been exposed to xylazine in the illicit opioid supply (especially fentanyl) or in other drugs, particularly in some areas of the Northeast. Xylazine is an α-2 adrenergic agonist that decreases sympathetic nervous system activity. When combined with fentanyl or heroin, it is purported to extend the duration of the opioid's sedative effect and to cause dependence and an associated withdrawal syndrome; however, data to support these concerns are limited. Despite the escalating frequency of detection of xylazine in people with nonfatal and fatal opioid overdose, direct links to these outcomes have not been identified. Because the strongest causal link is to fentanyl coexposure, ventilatory support and naloxone remain the cornerstones of overdose management. Xylazine is also associated with severe tissue injury, including skin ulcers and tissue loss, but little is known about the underlying mechanisms. Nonetheless, strategies for prevention and treatment are emerging. The significance and clinical effects of xylazine as an adulterant is focused on 4 domains that merit further evaluation: fentanyl-xylazine overdose, xylazine dependence and withdrawal, xylazine-associated dermal manifestations, and xylazine surveillance and detection in clinical and nonclinical settings. This report reflects the Proceedings of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for the Clinical Trials Network convening of clinical and scientific experts, federal staff, and other stakeholders to describe emerging best practices for treating people exposed to xylazine-adulterated opioids. Participants identified scientific gaps and opportunities for research to inform clinical practice in emergency departments, hospitals, and addiction medicine settings.

A survey of barriers and facilitators to the adoption of buprenorphine prescribing after implementation of a New Jersey-wide incentivized DATA-2000 waiver training program.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-involved overdose deaths continue to rise in the US, despite availability of highly effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD), in part due to the insufficient number of treatment providers. Barriers include the need for providers to gain expertise and confidence in providing MOUD to their patients who need these treatments. To mitigate this barrier, New Jersey sponsored a buprenorphine training program with financial incentives for participation, which met the then existing requirement for the DATA-2000 waiver. In a 2019 follow-up survey, participants reported on barriers and facilitators to subsequent buprenorphine prescribing. METHODS: Participants in the training program completed a 10-min electronic survey distributed via email. The survey addressed demographics, practice characteristics, current buprenorphine prescribing, and barriers and facilitators to adoption and/or scale up of buprenorphine prescribing. RESULTS: Of the 440 attendees with a valid email address, 91 individuals completed the survey for a response rate of 20.6%. Of the 91 respondents, 89 were eligible prescribers and included in the final analysis. Respondents were predominantly female (n = 55, 59.6%) and physicians (n = 55, 61.8%); representing a broad range of specialties and practice sites. 65 (73%) of respondents completed the training and DEA-registration, but only 31 (34.8%) were actively prescribing buprenorphine. The most frequently cited barriers to buprenorphine prescribing were lack of access to support services such as specialists in addiction, behavioral health services, and psychiatry. The most frequently reported potential facilitators were integrated systems with direct access to addiction specialists and psychosocial services, easier referral to behavioral health services, more institutional support, and improved guidance on clinical practice standards for OUD treatment. CONCLUSION: More than half (52.3%) of those who completed incentivized training and DEA registration failed to actively prescribe buprenorphine. Results highlight provider perceptions of inadequate availability of support for the complex needs of patients with OUD and suggest that broader adoption of buprenorphine prescribing will require scaling up support to clinicians, including increased availability of specialized addiction and mental health services.

A qualitative assessment of emergency physicians' experiences with robust emergency department buprenorphine bridge programs.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency departments (EDs) are a critical point of entry into treatment for patients struggling with opioid use disorder (OUD). When initiated in the ED, buprenorphine is associated with increased addiction treatment engagement at 30 days when initiated. Despite this association, it has had slow adoption. The barriers to ED buprenorphine utilization are well documented; however, the benefits of prescribing buprenorphine for emergency physicians (EPs) have not been explored. This study utilized semistructured interviews to explore and understand how EPs perceive their experiences working in EDs that have successfully implemented ED bridge programs (EDBPs) for patients with OUD. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with EPs from four geographically diverse academic hospitals with established EDBPs. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and emergent themes were identified using codebook thematic analysis. Analysis credibility and transparency were confirmed with peer debriefing. RESULTS: Twenty-two interviews were conducted across the four sites. Three key themes were constructed during the analyses: (1) provided EPs agency; (2) transformed EPs' emotions, attitudes, and behaviors related to treating patients with OUD; and (3) improved EPs' professional quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in this study reported several common themes related to participation in their hospital's BP. Overall our results suggest that physicians who participate in EDBPs may feel a renewed sense of fulfillment and purpose in their personal and professional lives. These positive changes may lead to increased job satisfaction in hospitals that have successfully launched EDBP.

Research Priorities to Improve Treatment of Patients Exposed to Xylazine-fentanyl: Rapid Communication from a National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for the Clinical Trials Network Meeting.

ABSTRACT: In response to the rapid escalation in the detection of xylazine in the unregulated drug supply, in April 2023, the White House designated fentanyl contaminated with xylazine an "emerging threat." The National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for Clinical Trials Network convened a multidisciplinary meeting of stakeholders, federal staff members, researchers, and clinicians caring for patients with fentanyl and xylazine exposures. This convening focused on the most critical areas of concern with the goal of describing current practices and a xylazine-fentanyl research agenda. Discussions focused on the domains of epidemiology and laboratory detection, xylazine withdrawal and overdose, and dermal manifestations. The authors were involved in planning and moderating the program and providing a summary of the proceedings.

Evaluation of an injectable monthly extended-release buprenorphine program in a low-barrier specialty addiction medicine clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Monthly injectable extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) can address several systemic and individual barriers to consistent sublingual buprenorphine treatment for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Real-world evaluations of XR-BUP in the outpatient addiction treatment setting are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare 6-month treatment retention and urine drug tests between patients who initiated XR-BUP compared to those who were prescribed but did not initiate XR-BUP in a low-barrier addiction medicine specialty clinic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with OUD prescribed XR-BUP between 12/1/2018 and 12/31/2020 in a low-barrier addiction medicine specialty clinic to compare 6-month treatment retention between patients who initiated XR-BUP and those who were prescribed but did not initiate XR-BUP (comparison group). Secondary outcomes included percent of urine toxicology tests negative for non-prescribed opioids. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with 6-month treatment retention and XR-BUP initiation. RESULTS: Of the 233 patients prescribed XR-BUP, 148 (63.8 %) identified as non-Hispanic white, 218 (93.6 %) were insured by public insurance (Medicare/Medicaid), and nearly two-thirds were prescribed XR-BUP due to unstable OUD. Approximately 50 % of patients initiated XR-BUP treatment (mean number of injections = 3.7). About 60 % of XR-BUP-treated patients received supplemental sublingual buprenorphine and nearly two-thirds received a 300 mg maintenance dose. Six-month treatment retention was greater in the XR-BUP treatment versus comparison group (70.3 % vs. 36.5 %, p < 0.001). The XR-BUP treatment group had a higher percentage of opioid-negative urine toxicology tests versus the comparison group (67.2 % vs. 36.3 %, p < 0.001). Receipt of XR-BUP was an independent predictor of 6-month treatment retention (OR 5.40, 95 % CI 2.18-13.38). Those prescribed XR-BUP due to unstable OUD had lower odds of treatment retention (OR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.24-0.98) after controlling for receipt of XR-BUP and other variables known to impact retention. CONCLUSIONS: XR-BUP improved 6-month treatment retention and resulted in a greater proportion of opioid-negative urine toxicology tests compared to a comparison group of patients who were prescribed but did not initiate XR-BUP. Patients with unstable OUD had lower odds of XR-BUP initiation, suggesting the need for targeted interventions to increase XR-BUP uptake in this high-risk population.

Postmortem toxicology findings from the Camden Opioid Research Initiative.

The United States continues to be impacted by decades of an opioid misuse epidemic, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic and by the growing prevalence of highly potent synthetic opioids (HPSO) such as fentanyl. In instances of a toxicity event, first-response administration of reversal medications such as naloxone can be insufficient to fully counteract the effects of HPSO, particularly when there is co-occurring substance use. In an effort to characterize and study this multi-faceted problem, the Camden Opioid Research Initiative (CORI) has been formed. The CORI study has collected and analyzed post-mortem toxicology data from 42 cases of decedents who expired from opioid-related toxicity in the South New Jersey region to characterize substance use profiles. Co-occurring substance use, whether by intent or through possible contamination of the illicit opioid supply, is pervasive among deaths due to opioid toxicity, and evidence of medication-assisted treatment is scarce. Nearly all (98%) of the toxicology cases show the presence of the HPSO, fentanyl, and very few (7%) results detected evidence of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder, such as buprenorphine or methadone, at the time of death. The opioid toxicity reversal drug, naloxone, was detected in 19% of cases, but 100% of cases expressed one or more stimulants, and sedatives including xylazine were detected in 48% of cases. These results showing complex substance use profiles indicate that efforts at mitigating the opioid misuse epidemic must address the complications presented by co-occurring stimulant and other substance use, and reduce barriers to and stigmas of seeking effective medication-assisted treatments.

Xylazine Adulteration of the Heroin-Fentanyl Drug Supply : A Narrative Review.

Xylazine is an animal sedative, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, that is commonly used in veterinary medicine and is not approved for human use. Since 2016, xylazine has consistently appeared in the illicitly manufactured fentanyl supply and has significantly increased in prevalence, likely due to its low cost, easy availability, and presumed synergistic psychoactive effect. Clinical experience along with the available pertinent research were used to review xylazine adulteration of the drug supply and provide guidance on the care of patients exposed to xylazine. This review discusses xylazine pharmacology, animal and human clinical effects, and what is known to date about care of patients experiencing acute overdose, xylazine-fentanyl withdrawal, and xylazine-associated wounds.

METHADONE INITIATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT FOR OPIOID USE DISORDER: A CASE SERIES.

BACKGROUND: In an era of fentanyl and continually rising rates of opioid overdose deaths, increasing access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) should be prioritized. Emergency department (ED) buprenorphine initiation for patients with OUD is considered best-practice. Methadone, though also evidence-based and effective, is under-utilized due to strict federal regulation, significant stigma, and lack of physician training. We describe the novel utilization of CFR Title 21 1306.07 (b), also known as the "72-hour rule," to initiate methadone for OUD in the ED. CASE SERIES: We describe the cases of 3 patients with a history of OUD who were initiated on methadone for OUD in the ED, linked to an opioid treatment program, and attended an intake appointment. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? The ED can be a crucial point of intervention for vulnerable patients with OUD who may not interact with the health care system in other settings. Methadone and buprenorphine are both first-line options for medication for OUD, and methadone may be preferred in patients who have been unsuccessful with buprenorphine in the past or those at higher risk of treatment dropout. Patients may also prefer methadone to buprenorphine based on previous experience or understanding of the medications. ED physicians may utilize the "72-hour rule" to administer and initiate methadone for up to 3 consecutive days while arranging referral to treatment. EDs can develop methadone initiation and bridge programs utilizing similar strategies to those that have been described in developing buprenorphine programs.

Hospital-initiated Extended-release Injectable Buprenorphine Using a Novel Reallocation Initiative From an Outpatient Addiction Medicine Clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Novel strategies for initiation and continuation of buprenorphine are critical, especially during a pandemic when traditional opioid use disorder treatment pathways may be disrupted. We describe an innovative outpatient to inpatient reallocation initiative for extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) designed to repurpose an expensive medication for use in hospitalized patients facing treatment barriers upon discharge and pilot the feasibility of XR-BUP use in the inpatient setting. METHODS: We collaborated with our institution's inpatient pharmacy and a New Jersey Medicaid managed care organization to create an alternate pathway to make XR-BUP available to hospitalized patients insured by the same payor. In this process, XR-BUP doses were deidentified and transferred to the inpatient controlled substance inventory for administration to hospitalized patients at no charge by our Addiction Medicine Consult Service after a period of sublingual buprenorphine stabilization. Our reallocation pathway bypassed several existing XR-BUP regulatory barriers to allow for inpatient administration. RESULTS: To date, we have transferred approximately 85 XR-BUP 300 mg doses to the inpatient controlled substance inventory. This equates to a cost savings of nearly $145,000. CONCLUSIONS: Reallocation of XR-BUP from an outpatient to inpatient setting increased postdischarge buprenorphine treatment access while also reducing health care costs by repurposing an expensive medication that would otherwise go to waste. Use of reallocated XR-BUP in the inpatient setting may pave the way for addition of XR-BUP to the hospital's formulary to minimize treatment gaps after discharge.

Impact of Administering Buprenorphine to Overdose Survivors Using Emergency Medical Services.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of utilizing emergency medical services units to administer high dose buprenorphine after an overdose to treat withdrawal symptoms, reduce repeat overdose, and provide a next-day substances use disorder clinic appointment to initiate long-term treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study of patients who experienced an overdose and either received emergency medical services care from a buprenorphine-equipped ambulance or a nonbuprenorphine-equipped ambulance in Camden, New Jersey, an urban community with high overdose rates. There were 117 cases and 123 control patients in the final sample. RESULTS: Compared with a nonbuprenorphine-equipped ambulance, exposure to a buprenorphine-equipped ambulance was associated with greater odds of engaging in opioid use disorder treatment within 30 days of an emergency medical services encounter (unadjusted odds ratio: 5.62, 95% confidence interval, 2.36 to 13.39). Buprenorphine-equipped ambulance engagement did not decrease repeat overdose compared to the comparison group. Patients who received buprenorphine experienced a decrease in withdrawal symptoms. Their clinical opiate withdrawal scale score decreased from an average of 9.27 to 3.16. buprenorphine-equipped ambulances increased on-scene time by 6.12 minutes. CONCLUSION: Patients who encountered paramedics trained to administer buprenorphine and able to arrange prompt substance use disorder treatment after an acute opioid overdose demonstrated a decrease in opioid withdrawal symptoms, an increase in outpatient addiction follow-up care, and showed no difference in repeat overdose. Patients receiving buprenorphine in the out-of-hospital setting did not experience precipitated withdrawal. Expanded out-of-hospital treatment of opiate use disorder is a promising model for rapid access to buprenorphine after an overdose in a patient population that often has limited contact with the health care system.

Patient Perceptions and Potential Utility of Pharmacogenetic Testing in Chronic Pain Management and Opioid Use Disorder in the Camden Opioid Research Initiative.

Pharmacogenetics (PGx) has the potential to improve opioid medication management. Here, we present patient perception data, pharmacogenetic data and medication management trends in patients with chronic pain (arm 1) and opioid use disorder (arm 2) treated at Cooper University Health Care in Camden City, NJ. Our results demonstrate that the majority of patients in both arms of the study (55% and 65%, respectively) are open to pharmacogenetic testing, and most (66% and 69%, respectively) believe that genetic testing has the potential to improve their medical care. Our results further support the potential for CYP2D6 PGx testing to inform chronic pain medication management for poor metabolizers (PMs) and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs). Future efforts to implement PGx testing in chronic pain management, however, must address patient concerns about genetic test result access and genetic discrimination.

Attitudes on Methadone Utilization in the Emergency Department: A Physician Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Like buprenorphine, methadone is a life-saving medication that can be initiated in the emergency department (ED) to treat patients with an opioid use disorder (OUD). The purpose of this study was to better understand the attitudes of emergency physicians (EP) on offering methadone compared to buprenorphine to patients with OUD in the ED. METHODS: We distributed a perception survey to emergency physicians through a national professional network. RESULTS: In this study, the response rate was 18.4% (N = 141), with nearly 70% of the EPs having ordered either buprenorphine or methadone. 75% of EPs strongly or somewhat agreed that buprenorphine was an appropriate treatment for opioid withdrawal and craving, while only 28% agreed that methadone was an appropriate treatment. The perceived barriers to using buprenorphine and methadone in the ED were similar. CONCLUSION: It is essential to create interventions for EPs to overcome stigma and barriers to methadone initiation in the ED for patients with opioid use disorder. Doing so will offer additional opportunities and pathways for initiation of multiple effective medications for OUD in the ED. Subsequent outpatient treatment linkage may lead to improved treatment retention and decreased morbidity and mortality from ongoing use.

Management of Xylazine Withdrawal in a Hospitalized Patient: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Xylazine is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist commonly used as a large animal anesthetic. It is used as an adulterant in illicit opioids, and it is now well established that its synergistic effect with opioids increases lethality. The amount of xylazine adulterating illicit opioids is growing at an alarming rate, present in almost one-third of opioid overdose deaths reported in Philadelphia in 2019. Despite this, there are no reports considering the management of patients using xylazine chronically. In particular, there are no reported cases detailing the management of xylazine withdrawal or exploring the potential for ongoing treatment for those in recovery from xylazine use. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 29 year old female with opioid use disorder and chronic xylazine use, admitted to the intensive care unit for treatment of chronic lower extremity wounds thought to be due to xylazine injection. Her xylazine withdrawal was managed with a combination of dexmedetomidine infusion, phenobarbital and tizanidine, later transitioned to clonidine. By hospital day 4 she was no longer experiencing withdrawal symptoms. She was transitioned from full-agonist opioids for pain to buprenorphine via a buprenorphine "micro-induction" and was ultimately discharged on buprenorphine, clonidine, and gabapentin on day 19 of admission. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This case illustrates a potential treatment pathway that allows for safe and comfortable xylazine withdrawal in hospitalized patients. It also provides an introduction into several medical concerns affecting this patient population specifically, including xylazine-mediated soft tissue wounds.

Injection Drug Use and Healthcare Utilization in Patients Newly Diagnosed With HIV.

OBJECTIVES: To determine recent trends in: (1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnoses, (2) the proportion of patients newly diagnosed with HIV with injection drug use (IDU) and (3) patients' patterns of healthcare utilization in the year before diagnosis at an urban, academic medical center. METHODS: We performed a cross sectional study of patients newly diagnosed with HIV at a healthcare system in southern New Jersey between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2019. Patients 18 years or older with HIV diagnosed during the study period were included. Demographics, comorbidities, HIV test results, and healthcare utilization data were collected from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Of 192 patients newly diagnosed with HIV, 36 (19%) had documented IDU. New HIV diagnoses doubled from 22 to 47 annual cases between 2014 and 2019. The proportion of patients with newly diagnosed HIV and documented IDU increased from 9% in 2014 to 32% in 2019, chi-square test for linear trend P value = 0.001. Eighty-nine percent of patients with IDU had at least one contact with the healthcare system in the year before diagnosis compared to 63% of patients without IDU, P value 0.003. The median (interquartile range IQR) number of healthcare visits was 7 [2 - 16] for patients with IDU versus 1 [0 - 3] for patients without IDU, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an increase in new HIV diagnoses with an increase in the proportion of newly diagnosed patients with IDU. Patients with newly diagnosed HIV and IDU had high rates of health care utilization in the year before diagnosis presenting an opportunity for intervention.

Buprenorphine use and disparities in access among emergency department patients with opioid use disorder: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine, a partial mu-opioid agonist and kappa-opioid antagonist, is an approved treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Studies demonstrate that buprenorphine decreases cravings for other opioids, effectively ameliorates withdrawal symptoms, and decreases opioid overdose and mortality. However, buprenorphine remains under-utilized. Despite its low potential for misuse, research has reported wide use of non-prescribed buprenorphine, seemingly for its effectiveness in treating withdrawal and helping to maintain sobriety. We designed our study to describe patient experiences with both prescribed and non-prescribed buprenorphine usage and to identify potential disparities in buprenorphine access within a high-risk population of patients with OUD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a large inner-city university hospital from January 15, 2015, through April 30, 2018. Patients were eligible to participate in the study if they presented with opioid intoxication or after an opioid overdose and were 18 years of age or older. Research assistants administered surveys after the ED team deemed an eligible patient to be clinically sober. RESULTS: The study enrolled 423 patients. Most patients in this study were white (59.8%) and male (77.5%), with a mean age of 37.5 years. A majority of patients (58.4%) had Medicaid insurance. Of those, 15.8% had previously been on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with methadone, and 16.3% received outpatient buprenorphine. Most (72.8%, 95% CI 68.6-77.0%) respondents reported having used buprenorphine at one point. Of the participants reporting prior buprenorphine use, 15.5% had either traded, shared, or sold their buprenorphine in the past. Patients who obtained non-prescribed buprenorphine generally purchased it from a dealer, took only 8 mg at a time, and paid $10 per dose. Of those patients with a history of using buprenorphine, only 3.2% reported taking buprenorphine for euphoric effects, though 45.5% of participants declined to provide a specific reason for using the drug. Patients younger than 40 were more likely than those older than 40 to have taken buprenorphine in the past (81% vs 60%, p < 0.001). Further, white patients were more likely than nonwhite patients to have both used (42% vs 31%) and been prescribed buprenorphine (46% vs 25%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Familiarity with buprenorphine is high among patients with OUD, and our data show that there is a strong demand among these patients for access to legal buprenorphine-based treatment programs. However, a variety of issues hamper access to this medication. Most patients in our study reported having been to an in-patient detox or rehabilitation program, yet only 16% of patients participated in a buprenorphine-based program. Furthermore, less than half of patients surveyed (37%) received a prescription for buprenorphine, and few participants reported taking buprenorphine for euphoric effects. Our findings suggest that a major barrier exists in legally obtaining buprenorphine for treatment of OUD, and that there appear to be racial and other disparities in buprenorphine prescribing, further limiting access to patients. Buprenorphine access needs to be expanded to satisfy the unmet need for appropriate treatment of those struggling with OUD, with particular attention to older and nonwhite patients.

The Genomics of Opioid Addiction Longitudinal Study (GOALS): study design for a prospective evaluation of genetic and non-genetic factors for development of and recovery from opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: The opioid use disorder and overdose crisis in the United States affects public health as well as social and economic welfare. While several genetic and non-genetic risk factors for opioid use disorder have been identified, many of the genetic associations have not been independently replicated, and it is not well understood how these factors interact. This study is designed to evaluate relationships among these factors prospectively to develop future interventions to help prevent or treat opioid use disorder. METHODS: The Genomics of Opioid Addiction Longitudinal Study (GOALS) is a prospective observational study assessing the interplay of genetic and non-genetic by collecting comprehensive genetic and non-genetic information on 400 participants receiving medication for opioid use disorder. Participants will be assessed at four time points over 1 year. A saliva sample will be collected for large-scale genetic data analyses. Non-genetic assessments include validated surveys measuring addiction severity, depression, anxiety, and adverse childhood experiences, as well as treatment outcomes such as urine toxicology results, visit frequency, and number of pre and post-treatment overdoses extracted from electronic medical records. DISCUSSION: We will use these complex data to investigate the relative contributions of genetic and non-genetic risk factors to opioid use disorder and related treatment outcomes.

Buprenorphine Field Initiation of ReScue Treatment by Emergency Medical Services (Bupe FIRST EMS): A Case Series.

The opioid epidemic is currently a leading health crisis in the United States, and evidence supports Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) as the most effective treatment (2). In our EMS system we are observing an ever increasing number of patients who, due to refusing transport after naloxone rescue, represent an access void at the point of overdose. We present a case series to illustrate a new treatment paradigm utilizing front line EMS paramedic units and high dose buprenorphine to treat withdrawal symptoms with next day bridge to long term care. The three patients described are exemplary cases, meant to represent overall characteristics of the intervention prior to complete data collection. Each patient was revived from opioid overdose with naloxone. Paramedics then treated each patient with 16 mg of buprenorphine to relieve and prevent withdrawal symptoms. Patients were provided with outpatient follow up irrespective of ED transport. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first EMS agency in the United States providing MOUD in the prehospital setting at the point of overdose. This innovative program provides EMS with education and tools to promote patient engagement. While still in its infancy, this approach utilizes existing EMS resources to bring MOUD to the prehospital setting, offering a new avenue to long term care. Keywords: Opioid, buprenorphine, emergency medical services, medication assisted therapy, naloxone, overdose.

Epidemiology of opioid-related visits to US Emergency Departments, 1999-2013: A retrospective study from the NHAMCS (National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey).

GOALS: To characterize the epidemiology of opioid-related visits to United States (US) emergency departments (EDs) and describe trends in opioid-related visits over time. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study CASES: The National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) was used to identify opioid-related ED visits between 1999 and 2013. MEASUREMENTS: The NHAMCS is an annual, weighted, multi-stage survey which allows for the study of ambulatory care services within a nationally representative sample of US hospitals. We used ICD-9 codes to identify ED visits related to opioid use and abuse. We applied visit weights calculated by NHAMCS to generate nation-wide estimates regarding the overall prevalence of opioid-related visits, and demographic characteristics of these patients. We report trends with respect to opioid-related visits and ED resource utilization between 1999 and 2013. RESULTS: 1072 visits were included, representing 2,731,000 nation-wide opioid-related ED encounters between 1999 and 2013. During this time, opioid-related ED visits increased from 125,000 in 1999 to over 300,000 visits in 2013. Between 1999-2001 and 2011-2013 opioid-related visits increased by 170%. Greater numbers of such visits occurred across nearly all demographic groups, and all regions of the US. Weighted visits among women increased by 250% between these time periods. Over these periods, opioid-related ED visits resulting in hospital admission increased by over 240%. The proportion of ED visits that were related to opioids doubled from 1999 (0.12%) to 2013 (0.25%). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-related ED encounters and resource utilization both rose substantially between 1999 and 2013, with consistent increases across a broad spectrum of demographic groups.

Elective Naloxone-Induced Opioid Withdrawal for Rapid Initiation of Medication-Assisted Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

We present a case of elective naloxone-induced opioid withdrawal followed by buprenorphine rescue to initiate opioid use disorder treatment in the emergency department. This strategy may represent a safe alternative to prescribing buprenorphine for outpatient initiation, a method that puts the patient at risk for complications of unmonitored opioid withdrawal, including relapse. After confirmation that the naloxone-induced withdrawal was adequately treated with buprenorphine, the patient was discharged with prescribed buprenorphine to follow up in an addiction medicine clinic, where he was treated 2 days later.